TOLERANCE OF UNCERTAINTY AND THE VUCA/BANI MANAGERIAL ENVIRONMENT

Authors

  • O. A. Nevadovskyi National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2025.3.31

Keywords:

tolerance of uncertainty; uncertainty; ambiguity; VUCA; BANI; integrative model; managerial environment; psychological safety; antifragility.

Abstract

This article examines tolerance of uncertainty (TU) as a key psychological precondition for effective management in today’s VUCA and BANI world. The aim is to synthesize the interpretation of TU from classical approaches to integrative models and align it with the VUCA/BANI frameworks. The study uses a narrative theoretical review with comparative conceptual analysis, content analysis of related terms, and conceptual mapping of linkages between psychological constructs and the managerial context. The findings indicate that VUCA/BANI elements can be interpreted as a configuration of sources and moderators of uncertainty within an integrative TU model. The analysis suggests that the newer BANI framework shifts the emphasis among contextual moderators – toward system brittleness, an anxious affective backdrop, nonlinearity of causes and effects, and limited interpretability of events. TU is framed as a manager’s meta-competence: it reduces threat-laden appraisals amid data gaps, supports various scenario planning, and enables timely decisions under incomplete and conflicting information. The analysis also highlights the cascading impact at the micro–meso–macro levels: from reduced decision latency and lower cognitive rigidity to the cultivation of psychological safety in teams and increased institutional trust in the organization. The proposed integrative framework that combines TU with VUCA/BANI models opens opportunities for more comprehensive training programs for existing and future management professionals. It is important to note that BANI remains a relatively young framework: it lacks standardized indicators and established measurement procedures and requires cross-sector and cross-cultural validation.

References

Baskoro G. From VUCA to BANI: A Challenge of Strategic Environment Facing HEIs // In: Bhawika G. W. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Business, Economics, and Management (IConBEM 2022). Atlantis Press: Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (AEBMR), Vol. 249, 2023. P. 229–235. DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-216-3_18.

Bass B. M., Riggio R. E. Transformational Leadership. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2006. 292 p.

Bennett N., Lemoine G. J. What VUCA Really Means for You // Harvard Business Review. 2014. Vol. 92, No. 1/2. P. 27.

Botea-Muntean D.-R.; Constantinescu R. VUCA and BANI worlds – Challenges for nowadays business models. Could circular economy and various digital instruments like Internet of Things help a business model to respond to such challenges? An examination of solutions and future strategies through marketing lens // Journal of Information Systems & Operations Management.

Vol. 18, No. 1. P. 38–54. [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: https://web.rau.ro/websites/jisom/Vol.18%20No.1%20-%202024/ (дата звернення: 25.08.2025).

Bryukhovetska O. V. Effects of ambiguity tolerance on educational organization heads’ professionally-important qualities // Scientific Notes of KROK University. 2021. No. 2(62). P. 176–184. DOI: 10.31732/2663-2209-2021-62-176-184.

Budner S. Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable // Journal of Personality. 1962. Vol. 30, No. 1. P. 29–50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1962.tb02303.x.

Buhr K., Dugas M. J. The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale: Psychometric properties of the English version // Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2002. Vol. 40, No. 8. P. 931–945. DOI: 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00092-4.

Burns J. M. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row, 1978. 530 p.

Carleton R. N. Into the unknown: A review and synthesis of contemporary models involving uncertainty // Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2016a. Vol. 39. P. 30–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.02.007.

Carleton R. N. Fear of the unknown: One fear to rule them all? // Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2016b. Vol. 41. P. 5–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.03.011.

Cascio J. Facing the Age of Chaos [Електронний ресурс]. Medium, 2020. Режим доступу: https://medium.com/@cascio/facing-the-age-of-chaos-b00687b1f51d (дата звернення: 18.07.2025).

Cascio J. The BANI World [Електронний ресурс]. Institute for the Future / Age of BANI, 2020–2022. Режим доступу: https://ageofbani.com/ (дата звернення: 18.07.2025).

Conger J. A. Leadership: The art of empowering others // Academy of Management Perspectives. 1989. Vol. 3, No. 1. P. 17–24. DOI: 10.5465/ame.1989.4277145.

Drucker P. F. Management Challenges for the 21st Century. New York: HarperBusiness, 2001. 224 p.

Drucker P. F. Managing in Turbulent Times. New York: Routledge, 2012. 256 p.

Endler N. S., Magnusson D. Interactional Psychology and Personality. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, 1976.

Fayol H. General and Industrial Management. London: Pitman, 1949.

Freeston M. H.; Rhéaume J.; Letarte H.; Dugas M. J.; Ladouceur R. Why do people worry? // Personality and Individual Differences. 1994. Vol. 17, No. 6. P. 791–803. DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90048-5.

Frenkel-Brunswik E. Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable // Journal of Personality. 1949. Vol. 18, No. 1. P. 108–143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01236.x.

Furnham A., Marks J. Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications // Current Psychology. 2013. Vol. 32, No. 1. P. 10–21. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-013-9168-2.

Greco V., Roger D. Coping with uncertainty: The construction and validation of a new measure // Personality and Individual Differences. 2001. Vol. 31, No. 4. P. 519–534. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00156-2.

Hancock J.; Mattick K. Tolerance of ambiguity and psychological well-being in medical training: A systematic review. Preprint. 2019. [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338118262_Tolerance_of_ambiguity_and_psychological_well-being_in_medical_training_A_systematic_review

Hillen M. A., Gutheil C. M., Strout T. D., Smets E. M. A., Han P. K. J. Tolerance of uncertainty: Conceptual analysis, integrative model, and implications for healthcare // Social Science & Medicine. 2017. Vol. 180. P. 62–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.024.

Klein K. J.; Kozlowski S. W. J. From Micro to Meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research // Organizational Research Methods. 2000. Vol. 3, No. 3. P. 211–236. DOI: 10.1177/109442810033001.

Kruger B., Barkhuizen N. The work role identity in flux of professional staff in a VUCA environment // SA Journal of Industrial Psychology. 2024. Vol. 50. Article a2181. DOI: 10.4102/sajip.v50i0.2181.

Kruglanski A. W., Webster D. M. Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing” // Psychological Review. 1996. Vol. 103, No. 2. P. 263–283. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263.

Lazarus M. D., Stephens G. C. Uncertainty Tolerance Conceptual Modelling [Електронний ресурс] // Preparing Learners for Uncertainty in Health Professions. Pressbooks/OER Collective, 2023. Режим доступу: https://oercollective.caul.edu.au/uncertainty-in-health-professions/chapter/uncertainty-tolerance-conceptual-modelling/ (дата звернення: 28.07.2025).

Mallak L. A.; Yildiz M. Developing a workplace resilience instrument // Work. 2016. Vol. 54, No. 2. P. 241–253. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-162297.

Menaria N. Comparative Analysis of VUCA and BANI Frameworks // International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. 2024. Vol. 6, No. 2. DOI: 10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.15715.

Merriam-Webster. Tolerance [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tolerance (дата звернення: 16.07.2025).

Newman A., Donohue R., Eva N. Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature // Human Resource Management Review. 2017. Vol. 27, No. 3. P. 521–535. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001.

Norton R. W. Measurement of ambiguity tolerance // Journal of Personality Assessment. 1975. Vol. 39, No. 6. P. 609–619. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa3906_8.

Rokeach M. The Open and Closed Mind: Investigations into the Nature of Belief Systems and Personality Systems. New York: Basic Books, 1960.

Schaedler L., Graf-Vlachy L., König A. Strategic leadership in organizational crises: a review and research agenda // Long Range Planning. 2022. Vol. 55, No. 2. Article 102156. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2021.1002156.

Sidanius J., Pratto F. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Taleb N. N. Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder. New York: Random House, 2012.

Taylor F. W. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York; London: Harper & Brothers, 1911. 77 p.

Trofimov A., Zabolotna V. Tolerance to uncertainty as a factor in the mental health of the population in conditions of war // Social & Legal Studios. 2023. Vol. 6, No. 3. P. 189–200. DOI: 10.32518/sals3.2023.189.

Weber M. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology / eds. G. Roth, C. Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Невадовський, О. А. (2025). TOLERANCE OF UNCERTAINTY AND THE VUCA/BANI MANAGERIAL ENVIRONMENT. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Psychology, (3), 165-170. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2025.3.31

Issue

Section

ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY; ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY