STRUCTURE AND NATURE OF METACOGNITIVE ACTIVITY

Authors

  • Yu. P. Vatan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2021.3.2

Keywords:

metacognitive activity, metacognition, metacognitive processes, cognition, self-regulation

Abstract

The article raises the topical problem of metacognitive phenomena. The results of theoretical analysis of metacognitive activity as a complex integrative structure, the main function of which is to manage the processes of perception, storage, processing and restorage of information is presented. Based on a review of existing theories, in which metacognitive processes as a component of different systems such as self-regulated learning, metacognition, and self-regulation, their main features such as consciousness, arbitrariness, and purposefulness were identified and described. It is substantiated that metacognitive activity is not a simple set of regulatory processes, but a complex formation that contains following components: motivational-emotional, reflexive-evaluative, volitional, operational and informational. The motivational-emotional component is represented by a set of needs, interests, desires that play a role in initiating metacognitive activity, that includes motives for both cognitive activity in general and the actual motives for taking measures to control the cognitive processes. The volitional component, which can be considered the core of metacognitive activity, as it accounts for the implementation of its main function, is represented by the processes of goal setting, planning of cognitive activity and control. They are carried out in the form of certain operations, among which the following can be distinguished: time allocation, selection of certain cognitive strategies or mnemonics, searching and correction of errors. Reflexive processes, the purpose of which is to monitor the cognition and make certain assessments, i. e. judgments that reflect its state, provide the subject with current information that enable possibility of taking regulatory actions. The informational component also includes the individual’s knowledge of the characteristics of his cognitive sphere in general, as well as knowledge about cognitive strategies that can be used in problem solving or completing some tasks.

References

Балашов Е.М. Метакогнітивний моніторинг саморегульованого навчання студентів : автореф. дис. … д-ра психол. наук : 19.00.07. Острог, 2020. 43 с.

Доцевич Т.І. Метакогнітивна компетентність суб’єкта педагогічної діяльності у вищій школі : автореф. дис. … д-ра психол. наук. : 19.00.07. Київ, 2016. 42 с.

Зайцева О.О. Мотиваційні чинники розвитку мета когнітивної активності у структурі академічної саморегуляції студентів : дис. … канд. психол наук : 19.00.07. 228 с.

Иванников В.А. Воля. Национальный психологический журнал. 2010. № 1(3). С. 97–102.

Карпов А.В. О содержании понятия метакогнитивных способностей. Известия ДГПУ. 2013. № 4. С. 12–19.

Карпов А.В., Скитяева И.М. Психология метакогнитивных процессов личности. Москва : Изд-во «Институт психологии РАН», 2005. 352 с.

Кашапов М.М. Творческая деятельность профессионала в контексте когнитивного и метакогнитивного подходов. Ярославль : ЯрГУ, 2012. 384 с.

Метакогнитивные основы конфликтной компетентности : монография / под науч. ред. проф. М.М. Кашапова. Ярославль : ЯрГУ, 2012. 412 с.

Савин Е.Ю, Фомин А.Е. Обобщенные и предметно-специфические метакогнитивные навыки в учебной деятельности студентов. Психологические исследования. Том 7. № 37. 2014.

Фомин А.Е. Метакогнитивный мониторинг решения учебных задач: психологические механизмы и условия развития в образовательном процессе : дисс. … д-ра психол. наук : 19.00.07. Москва, 2019. 434 с.

Чернокова Т.Е. Метапознание: проблемы структуры, типологии, развития: монография. Архангельск : САФУ, 2014. 168 с.

Azevedo R. Reflections on the field of metacognition: issues, challenges, and opportunities. Metacognition and Learning. 2020. № 15. P. 91–98.

Brown A.L. Knowing when, where, and how to remember: a problem of metacognition. Illinois, 1997. 152 p.

Borkowski J.G. A process-oriented model of metacognition: links between motivation and executive functioning. Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition. Buros-Nebraska Series on Measurement and Testing. 2000. P. 1–41.

Cross D.R., Paris S.G. Developmental and instructional analysis of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of educational psychology, 1988. № 80(2). P. 131–142.

Flavell J.H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. Stanford University, 1979. № 10. P. 906–911.

Hacker D.J. Metacognition: definitions and empirical foundations. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunloky, A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998. P. 1–23.

Koriat A., Levi-Sadot R. Conscious and unconscious metacognition: a rejoinder. Consciousness and Cognition. 2000. № 9. P. 193–202.

Kuhn D., Dean D. A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into practice. № 43(4). P. 268–273.

Lyons K.E., Zelazo P.D. Monitoring, metacognition, and executive function. Advances in Child Development and Behavior. 2011. Vol. 40. P. 379–412.

Martinez M. E. What is metacognition? Phi delta kappan. P. 696–699.

Metcalf J. Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions of Psychological Science. 2009. № 18(3). P. 159–163.

Nelson T. O., Narens L. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and some new findings. The psychology of learning and Motivation. 1990. Vol. 26. P. 125–173

Nelson T.O., Narens L. Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A.P. Shimamura (Eds.) Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. The MIT Press. 1994. P. 1–25.

Schraw G. Promoting General Metacognitive Awareness. Instructional science. № 26(1). Р. 113–125.

Son L.K., Schwartz B.L. The relation between metacognitive monitoring and control. In T.J. Perfect, B.L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition. 2002. P. 15–38.

Spehn M.K., Reder L.M. The unconscious feeling of knowing: a commentary on Koriat’s paper. Consciousness and Cognition. 2000. № 9. P. 193–202.

Zulkiply N. Metacognition and its relationship with students’ academic performance. In: National Student Development Conference, 8–9 August 2006, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Published

2022-02-17

How to Cite

Ватан, Ю. П. (2022). STRUCTURE AND NATURE OF METACOGNITIVE ACTIVITY. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Psychology, (3), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2021.3.2