FEATURES OF EXPERIENCING SENSITIVITY TO JUSTICE OF PEOPLE WHO WERE FORCED TO CHANGE THEIR PLACE OF PERMANENT RESIDENCE IN CONNECTION WITH MILITARY ACTIONS IN UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2023.3.17Keywords:
justice, sensitivity to justice, victim’s justice sensitivity, observer’s justice sensitivity, beneficiary justice sensitivity, perpetrator’s justice sensitivity, personal anxiety, situational anxietyAbstract
The article provides the results of the analysis of approaches to understanding the phenomenon of justice available in psychological doctrine. The basic statements of the concept of sensitivity to justice are defined. Distinctive features of victim justice sensitivity, observer justice sensitivity, beneficiary justice sensitivity, perpetrator justice sensitivity are characterized. Based on the results of an empirical study of the phenomenon of sensitivity to justice as a personal phenomenon of people who were forced to change their place of permanent residence in connection with military actions in Ukraine, it was found that in this category of people the observer’s justice sensitivity and perpetrator’s justice sensitivity prevail. The hypothesis concerning the respondents’ tendency to experience guilt when they commit unjust acts, and to feel anger when they face the violation of social norms by other persons, concerning the presence of motivation to restore justice, intervene in unjust situations and compensate victims of injustice, as well as concerning the predominance of prosocial tendencies in behavior is proved. It was established that people who were forced to change their place of permanent residence in connection with military actions in Ukraine have an increased level of personal and situational anxiety. It is proved that there is a direct correlation between the level of indicators of sensitivity to the observer’s justice sensitivity, beneficiary justice sensitivity, perpetrator’s justice sensitivity and the level of situational anxiety as well as between the level of personal anxiety and indicators of victim’s justice sensitivity, observer’s justice sensitivity, beneficiary justice sensitivity, perpetrator’s justice sensitivity.
References
Добровольська А.В. Відео підручник НЛП. Частина 5. Сила слова [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: https://event.alunika.com/nlponline/pt5 (дата звернення: 27.08.2023).
Клочек Л.В. Психологія соціальної справедливості у педагогічній взаємодії: дис. ...док. психол. наук : спец. 19.00.07 «Педагогічна та вікова психологія»; Національний педагогічний університет ім. М.П. Драгоманова. Київ, 2019. 565 с.
Фурман А.В., Шаюк О.Я. Соціальна справедливість як предмет психологічної рефлексії. Україна в умовах реформування правової системи : сучасні реалії та міжнародний досвід : матеріали Міжнар. наук.-практ. конф. [м. Тернопіль, 8-9 квіт. 2016р.]. Тернопіль : Економічна думка, 2016. С. 92–95.
Baumert A. Schmitt M. Justice sensitivity. Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. 2016, Springer. Pp. 161–180.
Bell W. S. The Archetype of Home and Secure Attachment to Self and Others: A Foundation for Individuation. ProQuest. URL: https://www.proquest.com/openview/6957afde2a8d37497df70a0a8a7b67c2/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y(date of access: 13.08.2023).
Davlembayeva D. Alamanos E. Equity Theory: A review. TheoryHub Book. 2023. URL: http://open.ncl.ac.uk / (date of the access: 31.08.2023).
Gollwitzer M., Rothmund T. When the need to trust results in unethical behavior: The Sensitivity to Mean Intentions (SeMI) model. Psychological Perspectives on Unethical Behavior and Decision Making. 2009. Pp. 135–152.
Gollwitzer M., Rothmund T. What exactly are victim-sensitive persons sensitive to? Journal of Research in Personality. 2011. № 45. Pp. 448–455.
Lerner M.J. The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. N.Y.: Plenum. URL: https://archive.org/details/beliefinjustworl0000lern/page/220/mode/2up (date of access: 25.08.2023).
Lotz S., Schlösser, T., Cain, D. M., The (in)stability of social preferences: Using justice sensitivity to predict when altruism collapses. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 2013. № 93. Рр. 141–148
Miller D. T. Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology. 2001. Vol. 52. Pp. 527–553.
Sasse J., Halmburger A., Baumert A. The functions of anger in moral courage – Insights from a behavioral study. Emotion. 2022. № 22(6). Рр. 1321–1335.
Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Fetchenhauer, D., Gollwitzer, M., Rothmund, T., Schlösser, T. Sensibilität für Ungerechtigkeit [Sensitivity to injustice]. Psychologische Rundschau. 2009. № 60(1). Рр. 8– 22.
Smith HJ, Pettigrew TF, Pippin GM, Bialosiewicz S. Relative deprivation: a theoretical and meta-analytic review. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012. № 16(3). Рр. 203–32.
Wijn R. van den Bos K. Toward a better understanding of the justice judgment process: The influence of fair and unfair events on state justice sensitivity. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2010. № 40. Рр. 1294–1301.