THE COGNITIVE DIMENSION OF PERFORMATIVE STAGING IN STUDENTS’ LEARNING ACTIVITIES

Authors

  • M. V. Karpovets National University "Ostroh Academy"

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2024.3.10

Keywords:

cognitive sphere, cognitive components, understanding, performance, performativity, staging, mimesis, studentsʼ learning activities

Abstract

The article presents a theoretical analysis of performative staging as an element of students’ learning activities. It is stated that staging can affect the cognitive sphere of students in the learning process, as it involves not only theoretical but also active reproduction of the material through a certain acting out on stage. The teacher sets a framework for reproducing tasks within which students try to transform the material into their own experience through performance. It is shown that the critical mechanism in performative staging is mimesis as a form of socialization of the individual and the establishment of connections with the outside world. In this context, the teacher’s figure plays a key role because the success of the staging and cognitive results directly depends on how clearly and convincingly, he/she directs the educational performance. Staging reveals activity as an element of students’ cognitive sphere, as it involves practical, active, and body-oriented reproduction of the material. Since performance involves collective activity, staging facilitates the mastery of the material through common activity. Hence, cognitive regulation through performance as an activity in higher education allows students to gain professional and social experience. Staging becomes a form of transferring knowledge through action and interaction with external reality. It is proved that due to the possibility of spontaneity in learning activities, students can perform the material more individually, transfer it to the sphere of feelings and experience. This individual learning style through performance creates equal conditions for all subjects of learning, ensuring a fair and inclusive educational process.

References

Ґумбрехт Г.-У. Продукування присутності. Що значення не може передати. Київ: IST Publishing, 2020. 192 с.

Карповець М. Перформативність як умова гетерогенності суспільства: культурно-антропологічний аспект. Людина і культура. Острог, 2019. С. 134–157.

Левченко О. Перформативність vs. театральність в аспекті перформативного повороту. Науковий вісник «Курбасівські читання». 2018. № 13. С. 13–25.

Пасічник І. Д., Максименко С. Д. Роль когнітивно-стильових особливостей особистості в процесі навчальної діяльності. Наукові записки Національного університету «Острозька академія». Серія: Психологія і педагогіка. 2010. Вип. 14. С. 3–10.

Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. 168 p.

Bachmann-Medick D. Cultural Turns: New Orientations in the Study of Culture. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2016. 311 p.

Bauman Z. Culture as Praxis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., 1999. 208 p.

Bruner J. S. The Process of Education. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1976. 92 p.

Butler J. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge, 2011. 256 p.

Dall’Alba G. & Barnacle R. An Ontological Turn for Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education. 2007. Vol. 32(6). P. 679–691.

Domańska E. ‘Zwrot performatywny’ we współczesnej humanistyce. Teksty Drugie. 2007. No. 5. S. 48–61.

Farrier S. Approaching Performance Through Praxis. Studies in Theatre and Performance. 2005. Vol. 25 (2). P. 129–144.

Krüger С. Anthropology of Performance or Anthropology of Contemporary Theatre. Brazilian Journal of Presense Studies. 2021. Vol. 11(2). P. 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2237-2660102508.

Schechner R. Performance Studies: An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge, 2013. 376 p.

Schechner R. Essays on Performance Theory 1970-1976. New York : Drama Book Specialists, 1977.

Schwartz T. Where is the Culture? The Making of Psychological Anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978. P. 419–441.

Singer M. When a Great Traditions Modernizes. New York: Praeger, 1972. 430 p.

Turner V. The Anthropology of Perfomance. PAJ Publications, 1988. 185 p.

Wiske M. S. (Ed.). Teaching for Understanding: Linking Research with Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998. 379 p.

Wulf C. Zur Genese des Sozialen: Mimesis, Performativität, Ritual. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2005. 178 s.

Published

2024-09-23

How to Cite

Карповець, М. В. (2024). THE COGNITIVE DIMENSION OF PERFORMATIVE STAGING IN STUDENTS’ LEARNING ACTIVITIES. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Psychology, (3), 55-59. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2024.3.10