READINESS OF MODERN YOUTH FOR ENTERING INTO CIVIL MARRIAGE: PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2024.4.7Keywords:
youth, civil marriage, relationship, de facto marital relationship, relationship, familyAbstract
The article analyzes the psychological features of the entry of young people into a civil marriage, analyzes the theoretical base, and conducts an empirical study. It was concluded that the choice of the form of marriage (informal or official) by young people is related to the influence of various factors: a) social, which include economic factors acting at the level of society, such as: liberalization of public opinion, a long period of study and career growth, economic instability in the country, prohibition or difficulties of divorce, economic independence of women, technical progress, place of residence, education, etc.; b) socio-psychological, which are caused by a change in sexual morality, the permissibility of premarital sexual relations; the dominance of marital values over the values of parenthood and kinship, orientation to extra-family values. It has been established that informal youth associations are heterogeneous and diverse depending on the motives for joining a premarital union and the functions performed by special «experimental» unions; informal marriages of young people are shorter, break up faster and more often than official ones. As a result of an empirical study of the psychological portraits of partners in a youth official/unofficial marriage, the specifics of conflicts in an official/unofficial marriage, it was established: 1) partners in unofficial cohabitation relationships are not characterized by a high level of commitment; at the same time, self-directedness, demonstrativeness and omnipotence tend to be much greater for spouses who are in an official marriage; 2) men who are in an unofficial marriage are characterized by rather conservative views, being very cautious in their actions and making decisions about entering into marriage only with a time-tested partner; women who are in cohabitation relationships show traits of a certain radicality, willingness to experiment, openness and loyalty to everyday inconveniences and ways of expression of their partner, on the other hand, partners in an official marriage have high self-esteem, much higher than women, in an informal marriage – men, these men have a certain level of aggression, it is also significantly higher compared to men who are in an official marriage.
References
Круглов Б. С. Правова свідомість як елемент психологічної підготовки молоді до сімейного життя. Питання психології. 1986. № 4.
Ляшенко Н.О. Подружні ролі в молодіжній сім’ї. Український соціум. 2007. С.16–23.
Сидоренко А.В. Фактори, що визначають готовність студентської молоді до сімейного життя. Київ : Теоретичні та прикладні проблеми психології. 2013. С. 243–247.
Титаренко Т. М. Сучасна психологія особистості. Київ : Каравела, 2013. 372 с.
Федоренко Р. П., Мушкевич М. І., Дучимінська Т. І., Магдисюк Л. І. Психологія молодої людини родина. Луцьк : Вежа-Друк, 2020. 392 с.
Хогенбум М. Поліаморія – кохання майбутнього. BBC Future – 2017. URL: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/vertfut-39711263
Blumstein P., Schwartz P. American couples. New York, 1983.
Demaris A., Leslie G. Cohabitation with a future spouse: Its influence upon marital satisfaction and communication. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1984. Febr. 46. P. 77–84.
Pollard M., Harris KM. Cohabitation and marriage intensity: Consolidation, intimacy, and commitment. RAND Working Paper. 2013.
Huang PM, Smock PJ, Manning WD, Bergstrom-Lynch CA. He says, she says: Gender and cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues. 2011. № 32(7). Р.876-905.
Manning W., Brown S., Payne KK. Two decades of stability and change in age at first union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2014. 76(2). P. 247–260
Ковальов С. В. Психологія сучасної сім’ї. К. : Просвітництво, 2010. 208 с.
Raley R., Crissey S., Muller C. Of sex and romance: Late adolescent relationships and young adult union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2007. № 69(5). Р. 1210–1226.
Sassler S., Miller A. Cohabitation Nation: Gender, Class, and the Remaking of Relationships. 2017. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1qft08h
Kpaвeць B. Teopiя та практика дошлюбної пiдготовки молодi. Kиïв : Kиївська правдa, 2010. 56 c.