USE OF AI IN ASSESSMENT OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL STATE

Authors

  • M. B. Bryhadyr Western Ukrainian National University
  • O. Ye. Koval Western Ukrainian National University
  • Yu. F. Vovchuk Non-governmental organization «Vovk Foundation»

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2025.3.7

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, psychophysiology, biomonitoring, neurotechnologies, AI ethics, digital medicine.

Abstract

Modern artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are radically transforming approaches to assessing a person's psychophysiological state, opening up new opportunities for diagnosis, prevention and improving the quality of life. Psychophysiological state, as an integral indicator of physical and mental health, plays a key role in professions with increased responsibility, psychology, psychotherapy, medicine, education and everyday life. Traditional assessment methods based on subjective interpretation and a limited set of indicators are giving way to innovative digital solutions. Innovative approaches to biosignal analysis, emotion recognition systems by facial expressions and voice, allow for continuous monitoring of a person's condition with high accuracy. At the same time, they give rise to new ethical and legal challenges related to data confidentiality, algorithmic bias and the need for informed consent. The article examines in detail: modern methods of analyzing psychophysiological indicators using artificial intelligence; promising areas of application in psychology, psychotherapy, medicine, education, sports and security; ethical dilemmas and legal aspects of the use of neurotechnologies; new professions at the junction of psychophysiology and artificial intelligence; standards for validation and regulation of psychophysiological algorithms. Particular attention is paid to hybrid approaches, where artificial intelligence acts as a powerful tool for supporting decision-making, but does not replace human expertise. Modern research confirms that artificial intelligence in psychophysiology is a powerful auxiliary tool, but it cannot replace human expertise. In the field of diagnostics, algorithms are able to analyze complex biosignals, such as EEG or micromimicry, but the final diagnosis and treatment strategy, therapy remains with a qualified specialist.

References

Abbas H, Garberson F, Liu-Mayo S, Glover E, Wall DP. Multi-modular AI Approach to Streamline Autism Diagnosis in Young

Children. Sci Rep. 2020 Vol.10(1).

Affectiva. Human Behavioral Research with iMotions. URL: https://www.affectiva.com/product/imotions-behavioralresearch/

(дата звернення: 09.07.2025)

Andel R, McMahan T, Parsons TD, Hort J. Virtual Reality Tennis Training: Performance Gains Derived from User

Characteristics. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2024. Vol.10. Р. 728-735.

Buolamwini J., Gebru T. Gender Shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification.

Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (FAT). 2018. P. 77–91.

Butler P., Au R., Becker A. & et al. Intuition Brain Health Study: a smartphone- and smartwatch-based virtual, observational

study using multimodal mobile sensing to classify and detect mild cognitive impairment. 2024. Vol.10.

Cao Z. et al. Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation using Part Affinity Fields. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis

and Machine Intelligence. 2017. Vol. 43, No. 1. P. 1302–1310.

Chikwetu, L. et al. Does de-identification of data from wearable Biometric Monitoring Technologies give us a false sense of

security? A systematic review. Lancet Digit Health. 2023. Vol.4. Р. 239-247.

Grosicki G. & Fielding F. & Kim J. et al. Wearing WHOOP More Frequently Is Associated with Better Biometrics and

Healthier Sleep and Activity Patterns. Sensors. 2025. Vol. 25. Р. 2437.

DARPA’s N3: The Future of Non-Surgical Brain Interfaces. 2024. URL: https://biodefenseresearch.org/darpas-n3-thefuture-

of-non-surgical-brain-interfaces/(дата звернення: 09.07.2025)

Hauselmann R., Sears A. et al. EU law and emotion data. arXiv. 2023.

King D. R. et al. Methods for navigating the mobile mental health app landscape for clinical use. Curr Treat Options

Psychiatry. 2023. Vol. 10, No. 1. .

Lin Y. et al. Feasibility of a machine learning-based smartphone application in detecting depression and anxiety in a

generally senior population. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022. Vol. 6, No. 3.

Lu Angelina & Perkowski Marek. Deep Learning Approach for Screening Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children with Facial

Images and Analysis of Ethnoracial Factors in Model Development and Application. Brain Sciences. 2021. Vol. 11. Р.1446.

Marks M., Haupt C. AI Chatbots, Health Privacy, and Challenges to HIPAA Compliance. JAMA. 2023. Vol. 330, No. 12.

P. 1101–1102.

Milton А., Chancellor S. The Users Aren’t Alright: Dangerous Mental Illness Behaviors and Recommendations. 2022.

Vol. 16. P. 690–701.

Musk E. et al. An integrated brain-machine interface platform with thousands of channels. Journal of Medical Internet

Research. 2019. Vol. 21, No. 10.

Pandarinath C. et al. High performance communication by people with paralysis using an intracortical BCI. eLife. 2017.

Vol. 6.

Sánchez-Monedero L., Dencik L. The politics of deceptive borders: ‘Biomarkers of deceit’ and the case of iBorderCtrl.

Information, Communication & Society. 2019. Vol. 22, No. 14. P. 2068–2084.

Rob Matheson. A market for emotions: With emotion-tracking software, Affectiva attracts big-name clients. MIT

News. 31.07.2014. URL: https://news.mit.edu/2014/with-emotion-tracking-software-affectiva-attracts-clients-mood-awareinternet-

(дата звернення: 09.07.2025)

Sánchez-Monedero L., Dencik L. The politics of deceptive borders: ‘Biomarkers of deceit’ and the case of iBorderCtrl.

Information, Communication & Society. 2019. Vol. 22, No. 14. P. 2068–2084.

Stephansen J. B. et al. Neural network analysis of sleep stages enables efficient diagnosis of narcolepsy. Nature

Communications. 2018. Vol. 9.

Tang J. et al. Speech emotion recognition via CNN transformer and multidimensional attention mechanism. Speech

Communication. 2025. Vol.171. .

Tariq Q. et al. Mobile detection of autism through machine learning on home video. A development and prospective

validation study. PLoS Med. 2018. Vol. 15. No. 11.

Toulas В. Clearview AI gets third €20 million fine for illegal data collection. 2022. URL: https://www.bleepingcomputer.

com/news/security/clearview-ai-gets-third-20-million-fine-for-illegal-data-collection/?utm_source=chatgpt.com (дата звернення:

07.2025)

Wachter S., Mittelstadt B., Russell C. Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions

and the GDPR. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. 2018. Vol. 31, No. 2. P. 841–887.

Wang H. et al. Research on non-invasive psychological detection technology based on artificial intelligence. Academic

Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences.2021. Vol. 4(3). P. 10 –16.

Youyou W., Kosinski M., Stillwell D. Inferring human traits from Facebook statuses. arXiv. 2018.

Yuan Y. et al. Machine learning applications on neuroimaging for diagnosis and prognosis of epilepsy: Journal of

Neuroscience Methods. 2022. Vol. 368.

Zhang L. Applications of Google MediaPipe Pose Estimation Using a Single Camera. Мaster project. 2022. Wuhan

University. 33 р.

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Бригадир, М. Б., Коваль, О. Є., & Вовчук, Ю. Ф. (2025). USE OF AI IN ASSESSMENT OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL STATE. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Psychology, (3), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2025.3.7