ARCHITECTURE OF MEANINGS OF COMBAT SERVICE MEMBERS: DYNAMICS OF REORGANIZATION AND SOMATIC-MEANING INTEGRATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2025.4.27Keywords:
worldview, meaning architecture, military personnel, posttraumatic growth, embodied meaning integration, meaning dynamics, combat experienceAbstract
The article substantiates a comprehensive theoretical and methodological model of the meaning architecture of military personnel with combat experience and analyzes the dynamics of its reorganization under the influence of extreme wartime events. The problem of meaning transformations becomes particularly relevant in the context of full-scale war, when service members experience disruptions in fundamental assumptions about safety, control, justice, the self, and the future.The theoretical foundation of the study is the meaning paradigm of consciousness, which conceptualizes meaning as an integral unit of experience formed through the interaction of bodily, emotional, cognitive, moral, and social processes. The work also integrates key international approaches to post-traumatic change, including the model of posttraumatic growth, theories of meaning making and meaning reconstruction, the concept of moral injury, and P. Levine’s body-oriented model Somatic Experiencing.The proposed structural model comprises nine levels of meaning architecture – from somatosensory and affective to cognitive, imaginal, moral-value, identificational, reflective, existential, and integrative. A process-flow model of meaning dynamics demonstrates how combat experience transforms into a coherent meaning system through sequential regulation, emotional processing, interpretation, and integration. The study shows that psychological support serves as a key factor facilitating meaning reorganization, enabling the transition from fragmented or trauma-fixed states to coherent and life-supporting meaning structures.The proposed approach makes it possible to view the meaning architecture not only as a theoretical construct but also as a practical tool for assessing deep changes in the lived experience of combat and identifying resources for subsequent recovery. In addition, the model can be adapted for use in interdisciplinary research integrating psychological, social, and clinical dimensions of veteran care. The model provides a theoretical foundation for future studies and the development of psychocorrective interventions aimed at restoring meaning coherence and supporting veterans in the process of post-war reintegration.
References
Каліщук С. М. Генеза смислової архітектоніки свідомості майбутніх психологів-консультантів : монографія. Львів : Сполом, 2020. 304 с.
Погорільська Н. І., Найдьонова Г. О., Карпюк А. В. Ресурси посттравматичного зростання українців в умовах війни. Прикладна психологія. Професійна й організаційна психологія. 2024. № 4. С. 57–70.
Рева М. Особливості посттравматичного зростання учасників бойових дій із різним ставленням до майбутнього. Психологія і особистість. 2024. № 1(25). С. 129–139.
Cox K. S., Litz B. T., Smigelsky M. A., Kachadourian L. Understanding posttraumatic growth in veterans: Relationships with resilience and functioning. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2023. Vol. 36, No. 2. P. 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22954
Kuhfuß M., Maldei T., Hetmanek A., Flor H. Somatic Experiencing – effectiveness and mechanisms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 2021. Vol. 12, No. 1. Article ID: 1870000. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1870000
Lahad M. Coping and resiliency: The BASIC Ph model of coping and its application to psychotraumatology. In: Wilson J. P., Raphael B. (Eds.). International Handbook of Traumatic Stress Syndromes. New York : Springer, 1993. P. 559–573.
Lahad M., Leykin D. The BASIC Ph model and the SEE FAR CBT intervention: Two integrative approaches for building resilience and treating stress-related responses. Society for Stress and Anxiety Research Review. 2010. Vol. 12, No. 2. P. 89–100.
Neimeyer R. A. Meaning Reconstruction and the Experience of Loss. Washington : American Psychological Association, 2001. 328 p.
Park C. L. Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin. 2010. Vol. 136, No. 2. P. 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301
Payne P., Levine P. A., Crane-Godreau M. A. Somatic experiencing: Using interoception and proprioception as core elements of trauma therapy. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015. Vol. 6. Article 93. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00093
Porges S. W. The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-Regulation. New York : W. W. Norton, 2011. 384 p.
Tedeschi R. G. The post-traumatic growth approach to supporting trauma survivors. World Psychiatry. 2023. Vol. 22, No. 1. P. 16–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21050
Tedeschi R. G., Calhoun L. G. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 1996. Vol. 9, No. 3. P. 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02103658
Williamson V., Murphy D., Greenberg N. Moral injury: The effect on mental health and implications for treatment. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2021. Vol. 8, No. 6. P. 453–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00113-9
Wong P. T. P. A new science of suffering, the wisdom of the soul, and the new behavioral economics of happiness: Towards a general theory of well-being. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023. Vol. 14. Article 1280613. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1280613






