SELF PRESENTATION IN THE SITUATION OF PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL SELECTION: INTERRELATION ANALYSES OF SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS AND INDIVIDUAL PECULIARITIES

Authors

  • D. F. Olkhovskyi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2023.1.2

Keywords:

situation of professional psychological selection, socio-demographic factors, intellectual abilities diagnostics, conscious and unconscious level, job candidates selection, attitude to the evaluating procedure, motive of self presentation

Abstract

The article is dedicated to analyses of socio-demograpfic factors interrelations (age, sex, education level and job position) with intellectual abilities of job candidates, their personal peculiarities on conscious and unconscious levels, motivational sphere and type of attitude to the evaluating procedure in situation of professional psychological selection of the job applicants. To gain the aims of the research several psychodiagnostical methods were taken: Benton’s visual retention test (to evaluate cognitive functions and visual memory), the Szondi test and Lusher-test color-diagnostic (to evaluate unconscious motivation, mood, hidden disposition system and appetences), MMPI test (to evaluate the sphere of conscious, motivation and type of attitude to the evaluating procedure) and Pictogram test (to evaluate intellectual abilities, memory and peculiarities of the process of thinking). The methods of mathematical statistics were used to build path diagrams of regression models to inspect the interrelations between socio-demographic factors of job candidates and their individual peculiarities, which have been discovered by psychodiagnostical methods. It was discovered that the higher is level of education and job position – the lower is need of making positive image abut yourself, lie, glorification, while demonstrating false features of your personality. It is stated that women does not lie consciously about their image in better light, but sincerely believe in that. The age is influencing on the number of pictograms, that proves the memory aging fade. The procedure of psychological research of job candidates that combines methods of evaluating intellectual abilities, memory, peculiarities of the process of thinking, conscious and unconscious personal peculiarities and type of attitude to the evaluating procedure that determines the motive of self presentation as a polymodal characteristic – was proved and empirically verified.

References

Гриник І.І. Особливості самопрезентації особистості у студентському середовищі. Проблеми гуманітарних наук. Психологія. 2021. № 49. С. 51–60. https://doi.org/10.24919/2312-8437.49.255846

Дорошкевич А.С. Стратегії самопрезентації особистості у повсякденності. Вісник Національного університету «Юридична академія України імені Ярослава Мудрого». 2013. № 5. С. 245–254.

Кононенко А.О., Кононенко О.І. Самопрезентація як важливий регулятор соціальної поведінки. Наукові записки Національного університету «Острозька академія». 2017. № 5. С. 63–71.

Романченко А.П. Стратегія самопрезентації та її тактики (на матеріалі лінгвістичного дискурсу). Записки українського мовознавства. 2018. № 25. С. 197–209.

Arkin R.M. Self-presentation styles. Impression management theory and social psychological research. N. Y.: Academic Press, 1981. P. 311–333.

Arkin R.M., Appelman А.J, Burger J.M. Social anxiety, self-presentation, and the self-serving bias in causal attribution. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1980. №38(1). Р. 23–35.

Baumeister R.F., Steinhilber А. Paradoxical effects of supportive audiences on performance under pressure: The home field disadvantage in sports championships. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1984. № 47(1). Р. 85–92.

Festinger L. Social psychology and group processes. Annual review of psychology. 1955. № 6(1), Р. 187–216.

Kowalski P., Taylor A. K. The effect of refuting misconceptions in the introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology. 2009. № 36(3)/ Р. 153–159.

Leary M.R., Kowalski R.M. Impression management: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin. 1990. № 107. P. 34–47.

Leary M.R., Tchividijian L.R., Kraxberger B.E. Self-presentation can be hazardous to your health: impression management and health risk. Health Psychology.1994. № 13(6). P. 46–472.

Myers D.G., Smith S.M.. Exploring Social Psychology. New York: Me Graw Hill, 2012. 255 p.

Nijstad B.A., et al. The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European review of social psychology. 2010. № 21(1). P. 34–77.

Pittman T.S., Heller J.F. Social motivation. Annual review of psychology. 1987. № 38 (1). P. 461–490.

Snider M.L. A critical analysis of the nature and function of narrative in selected disciplines, using a contextual background of psychology. American School of Professional Psychology-Rosebridge, 1999. 175 p.

Published

2023-06-23

How to Cite

Ольховський, Д. Ф. (2023). SELF PRESENTATION IN THE SITUATION OF PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL SELECTION: INTERRELATION ANALYSES OF SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS AND INDIVIDUAL PECULIARITIES. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Psychology, (1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2023.1.2