STRUCTURAL MODEL OF STUDENTS’ RESILIENCE IN WAR CONDITIONS

Authors

  • V. O. Hotych

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2023.1.4

Keywords:

resilience, psychological resilience, components of psychological resilience, students, adolescence, war, structural model

Abstract

The article analyzes the directions of research on the concept of psychological resilience, namely: 1) as a personality trait; 2) as a process; 3) as an adaptation and defense mechanism of the individual. It is emphasized that each area considers psychological resilience from a different perspective, but does not contradict each other. The main definition of psychological resilience in our study is highlighted – we rely on the concept of American scientists B. Iacoviello and D. Charney, the authors consider psychological resilience as a psychosocial construct, which is described as an individual’s adaptive processes to cope with and recover from adversity, and sometimes even thrive after it. It is noted that the main stabilizing intrapersonal structures that determine the peculiarities of a person’s life path are life plans, identity, professional and moral self-determination, worldview, level of professional achievements, self-awareness and self-attitude, readiness for family life, and a system of value priorities. It is assumed that the adolescent period is sensitive for the formation of psychological resilience. On the basis of theoretical analysis, a structural model for studying the psychological resilience of students in wartime has been created, which identifies the cognitive, behavioral, emotional and existential components of the studied concept. We believe that these components should be identified in order to be able to consider psychological resilience from a thorough ontological level. Particular attention should be paid to the study of the mental resilience of modern youth, due to the fact that they are not able to respond to stress factors properly and to identify the factors of psychological resilience of modern youth, which will allow the development of effective programs of psychological support for adolescents.

References

Ahmad S., Feder A., Lee E.J., Wang Y., Southwick S. M., Schlackman E. Earthquake impact in a remote South Asian population: Psychosocial factors and posttraumatic symptoms. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2010. № 23. Р. 408–412.

Alim T.N., Feder A., Graves R.E., Wang Y., Weaver J., Westphal M. Trauma, resilience and recovery in a high-risk African-American population. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2008. №165. Р. 1566–1575.

Alloy L.B., Just N., Panzarella C. Attributional style, daily life events, and hopelessness depression: Subtype validation by prospective variability and specificity of symptoms. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 1997. № 21. Р. 321–344.

Block J. The role of ego-resiliency in the organisation of behaviour. Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology. NJ: Erlbaum. 1980. Vol. 13. P. 39–101.

Carver C.S., Scheier M.F., Segerstrom S.C. Optimism. Clinical Psychology Review. 2010. №30. Р. 879–889.

Collins J. The Stockdale Paradox. The Brutal Facts. 2014. URL: http://www.jimcollins.com/media_topics/brutal-facts.html

Garmezy N. Resilience in children’s adaptation to negative life events and stresses environments. Pediatric Annalіs. 1991. Vol. 20. P. 459–466.

Iacoviello B., Charney D., Psychosocial facets of resilience: implications for preventing posttrauma psychopathology, treating trauma survivors, and enhancing community resilience. European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 2014. V. 5. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/ejpt.v5.23970

Leontopoulou S. An exploratory study of altruism in Greek children: Relations with empathy, resilience and classroom climate. Psychology. 2010. №1. Р. 377–385.

Luthar S., Cicchetti D., Becker B. The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and quidelines for future work. Child development. 2000. Vol. 71. P. 543–562.

Masten A. Global perspectives on resilience in children and youth. Child Development. 2014. Vol. 85. P. 6–20.

Panzarella C., Alloy L., Whitehouse W. Expanded hopelessness theory of depression: On the mechanisms by which social support protects against depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2006. №30. Р. 307–333.

Pargament K.I., Koenig H.G., Tarakeshwar N., Hahn J. Religious coping methods as predictors of psychological, physical and spiritual outcomes among medically ill elderly patients: A two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Health Psychology. 2004. № 9. Р. 713–730.

Pietrzak R.H., Southwick S.M. Psychological resilience in OEF-OIF Veterans: Application of a novel classification approach and examination of demographic and psychosocial correlates. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2011. №133. Р. 560–568.

Silk J., Vanderbilt-Adriance E., Shaw D.S. et al. Resilience among children and adolescents at risk for depression: Mediation and moderation across social and neurobiological contexts. Dev Psychopatol. 2007. Vol. 19. P. 841–865.

Smith B.W., Pargament K.I., Brant C., Oliver J.M. Noah revisited: Religious coping and the impact of a flood. Journal of Community Psychology. 2000. №28. Р. 169–186.

Southwick S.M., Vythilingam M., Charney D.S. The psychobiology of depression and resilience to stress: Implications for prevention and treatment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2005. № 1. Р. 255–291.

Клочков В.В. Психологічні чинники стійкості особистості: наукові погляди. Вісник Національного університету оборони України. 2022. № 69(5). С. 58–66.

Ліба Н.С., Марценюк М.О. Формуваня та розвиток психічної стійкості студентської молоді. Міжнародний науковий журнал «ОСВІТА І НАУКА». 2018. Вип. 2(25). С. 129–134.

Міхова А.Г. Емоції і прояви емоцій: історичний екскурс (стресові та стресоподібні стани). URL: https://scienceandeducation.pdpu.edu.ua/doc/2010/3_2010/23.pdf

Психологія : навч. посібник / за наук. ред. О.В. Винославської. Київ : ІНКОС. 2005. 352 с.

Сафін О.Д. Емоційний компонент психологічної готовності військовослужбовця як його особистісний ресурс: проблема формування. Вісник Національного університету оборони України. 2022. Вип. 4(68). С. 139‒140.

Чхаідзе А.О., Самкова О.М. Особливості психологічної стійкості у юнацькому віці. Інсайт: психологічні виміри суспільства. 2019. Вип. 1. С. 51–58. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ipsd_2019_1_10

Published

2023-06-23

How to Cite

Готич, В. О. (2023). STRUCTURAL MODEL OF STUDENTS’ RESILIENCE IN WAR CONDITIONS. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Psychology, (1), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2023.1.4

Issue

Section

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY OF SOCIAL WORK