ANALYSIS OF THE CHALLENGES OF MEETING STUDENTS’ PSYCHOLOGICAL NEEDS DURING ONLINE LEARNING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2025.4.1

Keywords:

online learning, psychological needs, self-determination theory, autonomy, competence, affiliation, blended learning

Abstract

The article provides a theoretical analysis of the real and potential challenges of meeting the current needs of higher education seekers in the context of online learning. The paper examines the essence and interconnection of the concepts of «motive» and «motivation». A motive is defined as an internal impulse that shapes the direction of an individual’s behaviour under the influence of external factors. In the process of individual development, motives become stable evaluative dispositions that differ in content, direction, structural organisation, depth of awareness and stability. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of motivation as a complex system consisting of interrelated components. Motivation has a procedural dynamic that manifests itself in motivational cycles, states, and sequences. As a driving force of personality, it is integrated into a broader system of activity, where affective and cognitive processes are mutually mediated, forming a functional unity that regulates behavioural activity aimed at achieving goals and realising needs. The analytical framework of the study is based on the theory of self-determination, according to which the degree of personality activity is determined by the satisfaction of three basic needs: autonomy, competence, and affiliation. The results of the theoretical study showed that the online environment creates significant challenges for the motivational sphere of students. The most vulnerable of the psychological needs is the need for affiliation, as limited opportunities for direct interpersonal communication, reduced group interaction and deep social contacts significantly complicate the formation of a sense of belonging to a group.A high level of autonomy in online learning, in the absence of adequate self-regulation and control skills, can have a counterproductive effect. Excessive freedom without sufficient self-control often leads to chaotic work organisation and increases procrastination. It has been found that a lack of prioritisation and effective time management skills leads to unstructured learning activities; a lack of self-control complicates progress monitoring and error correction; low reflectivity limits the choice of flexible strategies in response to difficulties. It has been found that a blended learning format better meets the basic psychological needs of students, in particular autonomy, competence and social belonging.

References

Дробот О. В. Мотивація студентів до дистанційного навчання в умовах пандемії. Психологія та соціальна робота. 2020. Вип. 1 (51). С. 69–85.

Кісіль З.Р., Швець Д.В. Мотивація діяльності людини: Навчальний посібник у схемах, таблицях, коментарях. Одеса: Видавництво ОДУВС, 2023. 154 с.

Кревська О. О. Мотиваційні чинники професійної самоефективності особистості: дис. … канд. психол. наук: 19.00.01 / Ольга Олександірвна Кревська. Східноєвропейський національний університет імені Лесі Українки. Луцьк. 2018. 213 с. Режим доступу: https://ra.vnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Krevska-O.O.-dysertatsiya.pdf

Руденок А. І., Антонова З. О., Петяк О.В. Особливості саморегуляції студентів під час дистанційного навчання. Вчені записки ТНУ ім. В.І. Вернадського. Серія: Психологія. 2022. Т. 33 (72), № 2. С. 166–171. DOI https://doi.org/10.32838/2709-3093/2022.2/27

Українське суспільство в умовах війни. Рік 2024: Колективна монографія / С. Дембіцький, О. Злобіна, Н. Костенко та ін.; за ред. член.кор. НАН України, д. філос. н. Є. Головахи, член.-кор. НАН України, д. соц. н. С. Дембіцького. Київ: Інститут соціології НАН України, 2024. 450 с. Режим доступу:https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Avtorskyi_kolektyv/Ukrainske_suspilstvo_v_umovakh_viiny_Rik_2024.pdf?PHPSESSID=8qhnu3ttaq5r7p2pra18b7uou3

Cho M. H., Heron M. L. Motivating Students in Online Learning Environments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2015. 36 (1). Р. 80–99.

Hamidah N. Factors affecting students’ motivation in online class. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia. 2022. 14(2). 355–368. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2022.14.2.355-368

Hartnett M. Motivation in Online Education. Springer. 2016. 149 р. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0700-2

Hodges C., Moore S., Lockee B., Trust T., & Bond A. The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. 2020. EDUCAUSE Review.https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Lewin K. Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1947. 1(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103

Martin F., & Bolliger D. U. Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning. 2018. 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Maslow A. H. Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). D. Van Nostrand. 1968. https://archive.org/details/towardpsychology00masl_

Mayer R. E. Сognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 57–72, 3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.008

Ojo A. O., Ravichander S., Tan C. N., Anthonysamy L., & Arasanmi C. N. Investigating student’s motivation and online learning engagement through the lens of self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2024. 16(5), 2185–2198. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2023-0445

Pidbutska N., Knysh A., Chebakova Y., Shtuchenko I., & Babchuk O. Motivation behind the preference of distance education of higher education students. Journal of Education Culture and Society. 2022. 13(1). 201–210. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2022.1.201.210

Richardson J. C., & Swan K. Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Online Learning. 2019. 7(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864

Ryan R. M., & Deci E. L. «Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being» American Psychologist. 2000. 55 (1): 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Skulmowski A., & Xu K. M. Understanding cognitive load in digital and online learning: A new perspective on extraneous cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review. 2022. 34(1), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09638-9

Sun J. C.-Y., & Rueda R. Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2012. 46(2), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.46.2.d

Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and individual differences. Learn Individ Differ. 2024; 110:102423. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102423

Teodorescu D., Aivaz K.-A., & Amalfi A. Factors affecting motivation in online courses during the COVID-19 pandemic: The experiences of students at a Romanian public university. European Journal of Higher Education. 2021. 12(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1972024

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Волянюк, Н. Ю., & Тішунін, Є. О. (2025). ANALYSIS OF THE CHALLENGES OF MEETING STUDENTS’ PSYCHOLOGICAL NEEDS DURING ONLINE LEARNING. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Psychology, (4), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2025.4.1