PSYCHOLOGICAL SECURITY OF STUDENTS IN THE MEDIA ENVIRONMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2021.4.8Keywords:
media psychology, psychological security, media activity, social networks, youthAbstract
The article reveals the features of psychological security of the student’s personality in the media environment. Modern youth constantly turn to media activity to realize their own communicative, educational and other needs. However, the psychological consequences of such an active transition to online functioning have not yet been fully explored. Social networks have posed two pressing questions to the Internet community: privacy and freedom of speech. The issue of privacy in the media environment is often raised, which is a direct threat to the individual’s psychological security. To increase the level of psychological security in the media environment, scientists recommend the development of critical thinking, as well as to form an established system of personal values. The aim of the article was to study the relationship between psychological security and media activity as part of the student’s social life. To achieve the goal of the study, the methods “Diagnosis of psychological security of the individual” (I. Prikhodko) and the Questionnaire of media activity of the individual (author’s) were used. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used for statistical description of the data. The survey involved 52 students 1–4 years, aged 17–20 years. As a result, we found a statistically significant relationship between media activity and psychological security of the individual. Relatively safe for the psychological well-being of the individual is such media activity as watching online broadcasts or videos of programs and series. A threat to the individual’s psychological security can be such actions on the network as the publication of their own photos and their distribution, commenting on content on social networks. We see the prospects of the study in the investigation of individual’s psychological security in the media environment, taking into account the cognitive style of the student’s thinking.
References
Астахова Л.В., Харлампьева Т.В. Критическое мышление как средство обеспечения информационно-психологической безопасности личности. Москва : РАН, 2009. 136 с.
Баева И.А. Психологическая безопасность в образовании : монография. Санкт-Петербург : Союз, 2002. 271 с.
Бакулев Г.П. Массовая коммуникация. Москва : Аспект Пресс, 2010. 192 с.
Волохонский В.Л., Зайцева Ю.Е., Соколова М.М. Личность и межличностное взаимодействие в сети Internet. Санкт-Петербург : СПбГУ, 2007. 196 с.
Коструба Н.С. Медіарелігійна активність як чинник психологічного благополуччя особистості. Психологічні перспективи, 2021. Вип. 38. С. 110–123. https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2021-38-110-123
Лазорко О.В. Психологія безпеки особистості як суб’єкта професіоналізації. Психологічні перспективи, 2017. Вип. 30. С. 96–112. https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2017-30-96-112
Лещинська О.А. Інформаційно-психологічна безпека: концепція соціокультурного імунітету : монографія. Івано-Франківськ : ПП Кузів Б.П., 2013. 144 с.
Слюсаревський М.М., Найдьонова Л.А., Титаренко Т.М., Татенко В.О., Горностай П.П., Кочубейник О.М., Лазоренко Б.П. Життєвий світ і психологічна безпека людини в умовах суспільних змін. Реферативний опис роботи. Київ : Талком, 2020. 318 с.
Харламенкова Н.Е. Понятие психологической безопасности и его обоснование с разных научных позиций. Психологический журнал. 2019. Т. 40. № 1. С. 28–37.
Шинкар, М.І. Психологічна безпека особистості студента. Вчені записки ТНУ імені В.І. Вернадського. Серія: Психологія. Т. 32 (71) № 1. 2021. С. 75–80. https://doi.org/10.32838/2709-3093/2021.1/13
Bashir M., Wee C., Memon N., Guo B. Profiling cybersecurity competition participants: Self-efficacy, decision-making and interests predict effectiveness of competitions as a recruitment tool. Computers & Security. 2017. Vol. 65. P. 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2016.10.007
Budimir S., Fontaine J., Huijts N., Haans A., Loukas G., Roesch E. Emotional Reactions to Cybersecurity Breach Situations: Scenario-Based Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2021. № 23 (5). e24879. https://doi.org/10.2196/24879
Kennison S.M., Chan-Tin E. Taking Risks With Cybersecurity: Using Knowledge and Personal Characteristics to Predict Self-Reported Cybersecurity Behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020. № 11. Р. 546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.546546
Use of Information and Communication Technology by the World’s Children and Youth. ITU. 2008. https://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/material/Youth_2008.pdf.
Raywood-Burke G., Bishop L.M., Asquith P.M., Morgan P.L. Human Individual Difference Predictors in Cyber-Security: Exploring an Alternative Scale Method and Data Resolution to Modelling Cyber Secure Behavior. HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12788. Springer, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77392-2_15.