THE DYNAMISM OF EXPERIENCING PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2023.1.6Keywords:
positive personality functioning, psychological health, happiness, well-being, psychological well-being, subjective well-being, dynamism of experiencing psychological well-being, psychological resourcesAbstract
The article analyses the scientific polemics of domestic and foreign psychologists on the issue of the positive functioning of the individual. The research explores the importance of psychological well-being as a crucial element of an individual’s positive functioning in modern society. Achieving balance and stability in psychological well-being is an essential topic that cannot be overlooked or underestimated. It has been extensively discussed and debated in social and psychological sciences, which this research emphasizes. The article outlines an attempt to understand the debate about finding a balance point, the desired stabilization of psychological well-being (Cummins, theory of homeostasis) or the healthy functioning of personal well-being according to the oscillating principle of balance-imbalance. The research highlights the dynamism of experiencing psychological wellbeing. To achieve our goal, we examine established theories of psychological well-being, such as hedonistic, eudaemonic, and dynamic. Furthermore, we explore the concept of achieving equilibrium between available resources and obstacles and emphasize the significance of maintaining a state of well-being through homeostasis. After analyzing K. Riff’s scale, we have noticed that psychological well-being can fluctuate over time. Summarizing the results of our scientific research of the discussions on the explanation of psychological well-being, we pay more and more attention to the understanding of psychological well-being not as the goal of the desire for satisfaction and stabilization of the psycho-socio-emotional state, but as a consequence of the achievement of the need for psychological well-being, on the way of which we encounter the inevitability of realizing a responsible valuable realization of being.
References
Вернік О. Л. Суб’єктивне і психологічне благополуччя: проблема інтеграції евдеймонічного і гедоністичного підходів: Матеріали всеукраїнського науково-практичного семінару (25 вересня 2019 року, Київ) / за ред. Ю.М. Швалба. Київ: Інститут психології імені Г.С. Костюка НАПН України, 2019. C. 9–13.
Дворник М. С. Психологічне благополуччя особистості під час переходу від війни до миру. Наукові студії із соціальної та політичної психології. 2020. Вип. 45(48), с. 79–87.
Карсканова С. В. Опитувальник «Шкали психологічного благополуччя» К. Ріфф: процес та результат адаптації. Практична психологія та соціальна робота. 2011. 1, с. 1–9.
Титаренко Т.М. Способи підвищення психологічного благополуччя особистості, що пережила травму. Психологія: теорія і практика. 2018. 1, с. 112–119. URL: https://www.academia.edu/38037433
Франкл В. Лікар та душа. Основи логотерапії. Харків, КСД. 2018, 284 с.
Cummins, R. Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A Synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2010. 11, 1–17. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9167-0
Dodge, R., Daly, A. P., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L. D. The Challenge of Defining Wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2012. 2, 222–235. URL: https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v2i3.4
Lunov V., Lytvynenko O., Zlatova L. The Impact of Russian Military Aggression on the Psychological Health of Ukrainian Youth. American Behavioral Scientist (ABS), 2022, Volume 67, Issue 3, р. 426–448. URL: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7085-8454
Ryff C. D., Singer B. H. Know thyself and become what you are: a eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2008. Vol. 9. p. 13–39.
Seligman M. Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being Paperback. 2012. 368 р.
Shah H., Marks N. Manifesto of well-being for the prosperity of society. London, United Kingdom: New Economy Fund. 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198567523.003.0020
Stroebe M., Schut H. The dual process model of coping with bereavement: rationale and description, Death Studies, 1999. 23:3, p. 197–224. To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/074811899201046