HARDINESS AS A LEADING RESOURCE FOR OVERCOMING NEGATIVE FEELINGS OF UNCERTAINTY SITUATIONS OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS DURING WAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2024.4.15Keywords:
hardiness, tolerance to uncertainty, war, high school students, resourceAbstract
The article describes the concept of sustainability, in particular its importance in the manifestation of tolerance to uncertainty. Hardiness is presented as an effective mechanism for overcoming traumatic experiences, which helps maintain mental health in difficult situations and reach a new level of development. And tolerance to uncertainty is a personality characteristic that determines how an individual perceives ambiguous situations, regardless of the emotional color of this uncertainty. In particular, individuals who are tolerant of uncertainty see every situation as an opportunity for growth and gaining new experience. They show flexibility and readiness for changes, the ability to act actively and productively in conditions of uncertainty. It is emphasized that high school students are a special risk group during extreme situations of war, they are the most sensitive group, who are under the influence of biological, psychological and social changes. The war significantly affects the process of forming their identity, disrupts the process of interpersonal communication and social relations, exacerbates stress and anxiety, exacerbates the feeling of uncertainty about one’s own future, which negatively affects mental health, destroys life plans, deprives the ability to satisfy basic need. The article presents the results of the study of the relationship between hardiness and tolerance to uncertainty, as well as the characteristics of the manifestation of tolerance to uncertainty, readiness for change among high school students. In particular, it was found that hardiness has a direct strong statistically significant relationship (the strength of the relationship is 0.737, significance is 0.000) with passion, (the strength of the relationship is 0.879, significance is 0.000) courage, (the strength of the relationship is 0.658, significance 0.000) adaptability, as well as (the strength of the relationship is 0.778, significance 0.008) tolerance to ambiguity. Also, it was determined that girls are more inclined to show tolerance to uncertainty and resilience than boys. In particular, they show a higher level of passion and adaptability, while boys have a higher level of confidence, which helps them overcome feelings of uncertainty. Hardiness contributes to a person’s ability to cope with difficulties and challenges in life, in particular, it is accompanied by the manifestation of passion, which determines internal motivation and determination to overcome obstacles in difficult situations; manifestation of courage, which forms the ability to make important decisions and act despite fear; adaptability, the ability to quickly adapt to changes; and most importantly, tolerance for ambiguity. The ability to accept uncertainty helps to maintain inner calm and make informed decisions, even when the situation is extreme. This goes a long way toward reducing stress and improving emotional well-being. The article emphasizes that the development of hardiness can significantly improve the general psychological state of a person and his ability to cope with difficulties, in particular, the uncertainty of the future and the changing present.
References
Методика дослідження особистісної готовності до змін А. Ролнік, С. Хезер, М. Голд, К. Хал; адаптація Н. Бажанової та Г. Бардієра(n.d.). Retrieved from https://stud.com.ua/155512/psihologiya/metodika_osobistisna_gotovnist_zmin_personal_change_readiness_survey_pcrs
Панок В. Г., Предко В. В. Психологічні особливості посткризового розвитку українців в період війни. Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету. Серія : Психологія. 2024. № 2. С. 137–142. URL: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/742187 URL: http://www.psy visnyk.uzhnu.uz.ua/index.php/psy/article/view/324
Тест життєстійкості С. Мадді. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://ni.biz.ua/1/1_5/1_51709_test-zhiznestoykosti-s-maddi.html
Чанчиков І. Залежність рівня життєстійкості від віку та статі особистості. Освітньо-науковий простір. 2022. № 3 (2). С. 123–132. https://doi.org/10.31392/ONP.2786-6890.3(2).2022.14
Чанчиков І. К. Аналіз життєстійкості особистості: системний підхід. Теорія і практика сучасної психології. 2019. № 4. Т. 1. С. 59–62. https://doi.org/10.32840/2663-6026.2019.4-1.11
Чанчиков І. К. Психологічні особливості зв’язку рис особистості та самоставлення в проявах життєстійкості. Актуальні проблеми психології : збірник наукових праць Інституту психології ім. Г. С. Костюка НАПН України. 2019. Т. 7. № 48. С. 227–235. http://appsychology.org.ua/data/jrn/v7/i48/25.pdf
Чанчиков І. Самоставлення та емоційні переживання як чинник життєстійкості особистості. Вісник Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка. Психологія. 2020. № 2(12). С. 98–103. https://doi.org/10.17721/BSP.2020.2(12).18
Frenkel-Brunswik E. Intolerance of Ambiguity as an Emotional and Perceptual Variable. Journal of Personality. 1949. Vol.18. P. 108–143.
Hallman, R. J. The Necessary and Sufficient Conditions of Creativity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 1963. Vol. 3, № 1. P. 14–27.
Hirsh J. B., Mar R. A., Peterson J. B. Psychological entropy: a framework for understanding uncertainty-related anxiety. Psychological review. 2012. Vol. 119, №. 2. P. 304–320.
Kobasa, S. C., Maddi, S. R., & Kahn, S. (1982). Hardiness and health: A prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 168–177. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.168
Norton R.W. Measure of ambiguity tolerance. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1975. Vol. 39 (6). P. 607–619.
Quinlan E., Deane F., Schilder S., Read E. Confidence in case formulation and pluralism as predictors of psychologists’ tolerance of uncertainty. Counselling Psychology Quarterly. 2021. Р. 943–958. DOI: 10.1080/09515070.2021.1997918.
Stoycheva, K. Tolerance for ambiguity, creativity, and personality. Bulgarian Journal of Psychology (SEERCP 2009 Conference Papers, Part Two). 2010. Vol.1, №4. P. 178–188.